
Tags
Lady Macbeth (2016)
It is usually a fail-proof formula for British filmmakers: gorgeous 19th century costumes, lavishly detailed period sets, and an angel-faced murderess who eliminates her oppressors. The film Lady Macbeth (2017) has the right ingredients but the whole barely rises above its parts. Apart from its classic title, this darkly Gothic adaptation of an 1865 Russian novel has no connection and bears no resemblance to the works of Shakespeare.
Like many literary works from this era, the storyline is linear and predictable. Teenage bride Katherine (Florence Pugh) was sold to an older man and is now trapped in an oppressive and loveless marriage. Dominated by both her husband Alexander and live-in father-in-law Boris, Katherine is forbidden to go outside the house and must exist as an adornment, reading her bible and tolerating abuse. When the men go away for a few days, Katherine experiences such simple freedoms as walking in a field on a sunny day. She encounters a brash young farm hand Sebastian (Cosmo Jarvis) who later forces his way into her bedroom and they become lovers. All of Katherine’s senses are ignited and she is determined to rebel against her wardens. Her affair becomes known and one by one she coolly despatches her tormentors. When she is accused of murder she frames Sebastian and the story concludes with evil triumphant.
This is a visually well-crafted period drama but not one of its characters is more than a two-dimensional caricature. Although beautifully photographed, the characters are devoid of inner beauty. Stilted performance style and minimalist dialogue may work well as a stage-play but it struggles to translate comfortably to the modern screen. Silence is used to heighten tension but it mostly amplifies the emptiness of Katherine’s life and the shallowness of the narrative. For example, the reasons for her mistreatment are left unexplored, and her apparently limitless capacity for cold-blooded criminality left unquestioned. While the normally expressive Florence Pugh gives a mostly convincing performance, at times she appears bored and emotionless and even in the lovemaking scenes conveys an air of wishing she was acting in a different film. As the 19th century was not known as one of feminist sensitivity, the original play most likely was a study of an evil woman’s potential to disrupt the social order. In the modern era, the issue of female empowerment is more nuanced and intelligent than we see explored in this film.
It may be that applying modern cinematic expectations to a Russian classic is unfair. When it was first performed in Moscow, legend has it that Stalin stormed out and condemned the work for “tickling the perverted taste of the bourgeoisie”. The very of thought of a woman taking control of her life through multiple killings must have terrified the power elite. In that context, Lady Macbeth may be a solid work. But serious drama today expects more depth of characterisation and complexity of narrative interpretation. On these measures the film tends to underwhelm.
Director: William Oldroyd
Stars: Florence Pugh, Cosmo Jarvis, Christopher Fairbank, Bill Fellows
A United Kingdom production
I haven’t seen Florence Pugh in anything before…anything good on her filmography?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pugh is a fine actress but here she is constrained in a role and with dialogue that does not do her talent justice.
LikeLike
She was in The Falling and that was terrific
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well at least this film provided great fodder for your evisceration. Thanks for saving me an hour of two of my life. I’m surprised that you gave it 3 stars. As I read, I figured for sure it would rate 2 stars. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
The costumes, sets, atmosphere and filming are all four stars, while the characterisation and emotional impact are two stars. Its in the math.
LikeLike
Good response to my cavalier comment! It takes both finely tuned aesthetics, logical thinking, AND a bit of science to produce a defensible review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve got to say I really feel like I was able to invest in the characters much more than you seem to have been. Which is fair enough! I guess for me the performances, particularly from Pugh, were so strong that they carried me through
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m glad that you got more out of this than I did. There were many times I wished she would emote in some way to reflect the injustice of her situation but that stoic moon-faced expression stayed with her throughout. No doubt it meant to signify resolve but for me it came across as murderously callous and empty. Thanks for commenting.
LikeLike
Looked interesting, too bad it’s poorly executed
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your choice of films to review is so great. I think yours is the favourite blog I have on the wordpress.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. Thats a great compliment from someone who has such an impressive blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My reaction to “Lady Macbeth” was quite the opposite. I found myself cheering her on, despite the severity of her actions. Life had treated her unfairly through no fault of her own and I was pleased she appeared to get away with her foul deeds. (with the exception of the child. Felt sorry for him).
LikeLike
Your generosity becomes you; thank you for sharing it here.
LikeLike
Maybe it means i have latent criminal tendencies?
LikeLiked by 1 person