
Tags
The Shape of Water (2017)
Auteurism is a key part of filmmaking mythology that leads us to view a film more favourably because of its director, actors, or cinematographer. Sight unseen, any film directed by Guillermo del Toro will attract superlatives like ‘masterpiece’, and such labels are now all over the sci-fi fantasy The Shape of Water (2017). It can be lonely for anyone to write against this tide.
Also described as an adult fairy tale, the story is set in a top-secret research facility during the 1960s Cold War. Mute cleaner Elisa (Sally Hawkins) lives alone in a small apartment above a movie theatre and lives a life of dreams and fantasy. As an introverted fringe-dweller she gravitates to other outliers, like her closeted gay neighbour Giles (Richard Jenkins) and her best friend and workmate Zelda (Octavia Spencer), an African-American who is also Elisa’s sign language translator. Elisa’s yearning for romance is answered when an amphibian monster is wheeled into the facility inside a water tank. The monster and Elisa form an immediate emotional bond and Elisa is determined to save him from the sadistic director Colonel Strickland (Michael Shannon). When the monster is scheduled for dissection Elisa and friends hatch a high-risk escape plan, with the increasingly deranged Colonel in hot pursuit.
This is a luscious production full of Gothic foreboding, dreamy underwater atmospherics, and repressed sexual desire. The kitsch retro laboratory evokes 60s sci-fi spoofs with a heavily saturated other-worldly colour palette. It is not a spectacular or even original set design nor is the monster convincing or scary. Like Elisa, he is mute and his aquatic outfit is little more elaborate than a party costume with big holes to let his lovable eyes shine through. In case we doubt who is the bad guy, the Colonel is the only one with a disintegrating gangrenous limb to signify the moral decay of male authority. Whatever narrative nuance exists is found in novel twists on the Beauty and the Beast fairy tale template where our heroine finds eternal love in a most unusual way. With neither the monster nor the narrative especially original, it is Sally Hawkins alone who holds our attention all the way to the story’s implausible ending. As she did so beautifully in Maudie (2017), Hawkins has a unique expressive talent for portraying firm resolve with fragile vulnerability.
All fairy tales have a message, although some are more obscure than others. Unlike the thematic coherance of the brilliant Pans Labyrinth (2006), del Toro has left The Shape of Water wide open for interpretation and many are applauding its ambiguity. However, like a Rorschach test, what you see depends on what is going on inside your head, whether it’s the pain of ‘otherness’ or the yearning for love, mystery, excitement, or escape. Which returns us to the label ‘masterpiece’: if you are looking for one, you will find it. Others will be more moderately entertained with an engaging adult fairy tale that has more than enough charm for a full film of enjoyment.
Director: Guillermo del Toro
Stars: Sally Hawkins, Octavia Spencer, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins
I love the sound and look of this, she’s a great actress, and it’s off slant theme-wise.
– Esme waving and adding it to her ‘to see’ film list upon the Cloud
LikeLiked by 1 person
The affinity between Cloud and Water is obvious; this is your film Esme.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I gave it 4 out of 5 stars, but I do believe you are right in saying that the ambiguous ending can leave some thinking something is missing. Also, the love story could have played out more — gentle scenes that made the creature more “human”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is much to enjoy in this film and I can see why many rank it more highly than I have. Dashed expectations follow the over-use of words like “masterpiece”; I wish film marketers stopped calling every second movie the “best film of the year”.
LikeLike
I ignore those superlatives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am with you 100% here. I enjoyed this movie mainly for Sally Hawkins’ performance, but it isn’t as original a story as it first seems and I don’t quite get the devotion others have for it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We know the ‘halo effect’ that comes with big name directors; its interesting to see more balanced views starting to appear for this film.
LikeLike
Great review. I wrestled this movie quite a bit before finally reviewing it. I love the visuals and the performances. But several things about del Toro’s storytelling didn’t land for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I felt the same way Keith; visually charming but narratively lightweight.
LikeLike
Like my WP readings, I am way behind in cinema viewing so I have yet to see this one. The theme does little to attract me, although I did see a trailer for it some time ago and thought it looked interesting. I was surprised by how many stars you gave it, given the many aspects that didn’t seem to measure up.
Wasn’t there a film a few years ago in which a female linguist developed a personal “relationship” with a caged being from outer space? I can’t remember the details, but it seems to share some threads with this film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Its hard not to enjoy its charms, especially Sally Hawkins’ performance and the luscious photography. Overarching this, it has the quality of being seductive. That is, it can lure you into believing its premises and hold your attention while it presents a stream of cliches and homages to stories like Creature from the Black Lagoon, Beauty and the Beast, and the film you are thinking called Arrival. Despite gaining many Academy nominations, it is far from a masterpiece IMO.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on .
LikeLiked by 1 person
I too thought ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’ an excellent film. But I was put off seeing this one after watching the trailer. I have nothing against fairy tales, but give me fairy tales I can believe in 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah…dont we all wish for “fairy tales I can believe in”
LikeLiked by 1 person