
Tags
The Seagull (2018)
Fidelity of adaptation is a thorny issue in film discourse because it relies on the interpretation of context, characters, setting and script. If any of these do not respect the original, it is unlikely to satisfy. The American-made adaptation of the classic Chekhov play The Seagull (2018) meets all these criteria except the first, and that is one reason it will disappoint many.
The storyline is a crafted labyrinth of personalities and their foibles. At its core is a self-absorbed former grand diva of the stage, Irina Arkadina (Annette Bening) who is visiting her brother’s summer estate with her famous novelist lover, Boris Trigorin (Corey Stoll). Her son Konstantin (Billy Howle) is consumed by rage over his mother’s affair, a rage that spirals into suicidal depression when his own girlfriend Nina (Saorise Ronan) falls madly in love with Boris. At the periphery, there are more asymmetrical romantic pairings and victims of unrequited love who appear to exist simply to complicate the matrix of relationships.
Rather than have a forward-moving narrative,The Seagullis a collection of dramatic vignettes, each comprising a pair of larger-than-life characters mis-matched with someone they love without being loved in return. The film is without a hero or heroine and ends up exactly where it starts via an unusual repetition of its prolonged opening scene. Although seamlessly executed, the repetition creates audience confusion as a prelude to the film’s predetermined conclusion. Keeping track of the tangled mess of emotions is made possible by a stellar ensemble each playing a distinctly different caricature. There are a dozen lives on-stage yet each holds our attention, although Bening and Ronan dominate.
Together with stunning visuals, one would expect this film to soar, but it never reaches potential. The first criterion of a great adaptation is that the film should connect to the historical and cultural context of the story. Undisguised American accents undermine authenticity, and the film is silent on the escalating class hatred that was about to erupt in Russia’s violent revolution. It thus sanitises Chekhov’s work into an ahistorical capsule disconnected from its context. Perhaps a European production with genuine connection to European history may have avoided this limitation.
There is still much to enjoy in this film. It reads equally as tragedy, romance, and comedy of manners, but falls away as Russian period drama. Richly melodramatic but without forward momentum, the pace feels ponderous and the repeated opening scene feels more like gimmickry than a functional structural device. If Chekhov were here, it is unlikely he would rush to see it.
Director: Michael Mayer
Stars: Annette Bening, Saorise Ronan, Corey Stoll, Billy Howle
Sounds interesting. I will look for it in theaters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How disappointing. I’m a huge fan of Chekov. I wonder if the director mindfully stepped back from the contextual aspect of looming class warfare for fear of alienating (or inflaming?) American audiences. I feel like we are, ourselves, on the precipice of a cultural and class conflagration.
I love your reviews!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thats a very interesting observation Linda. Disconnecting the story from its source probably broadens the film’s appeal while alienating the literati. Your comment about “the precipice of a cultural and class conflagration” is sadly too accurate.
LikeLike
It feels like the whole world is coming apart at the seams. The US is unraveling ahead of everyone else…leading the way once again. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some of us on the outside looking in are more optimistic about your future. A deep line in the sand is being drawn in history; Trump is challenging America to define what it stands for and I have faith the people will rise to higher ground.
LikeLike
Sigh. I hope you are right. I’m not feeling at all confident. But then, I am an eternal pessimist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So Chekhovian.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing your thoughts here David. I cannot say I did not enjoy it, in fact I did. But I am unfortunately less forgiving of certain things. With Eastern European parents myself, I am acutely aware of and distracted by fake accents, and I have seen too many authentic depictions of Russian culture to ignore its shallow treatment here. I do agree with your comments about the “biting humour” and brilliant acting.
LikeLike
I agree that “Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn’t”. IMO, this production lies in the small space between working and not.
LikeLike