
Tags
Atomic Blonde (2017)
It’s strange logic to think that hyper-violent female stereotypes might make up for decades of weak or absent women in movies but that seems to be the current thing. Opinions on this will differ of course, as they will about the spy-thriller Atomic Blonde (2017). If you like frenetic pace, classic noir-espionage styling, and more heroine-inflicted casualties per minute than some war movies, this one is for you.
Set in 1989 against the backdrop of the imminent collapse of the Berlin Wall, the convoluted hall-of-mirrors storyline is framed as a series of flashback episodes. Heroine and M16 top spy Lorraine Broughton (Charlize Theron) is being interrogated by several bullying male superiors about an apparently failed mission to recover a microfilm list of undercover spies in Berlin. After the ultra-cool Lorraine recounts each separate phase of her mission we return to the interrogation for more questions which also help the audience make sense of it all. Narrative confusion is nothing compared to life in Berlin where nobody is what they appear to be and every spy she encounters is a double or triple-agent. The once trusted M16 operative in possession of the list has turned feral and Lorraine must get it back to London through a wall of Stasi, KGB, and French agents, and still finds time for a heart-warming lesbian encounter to show the softer side of a super spy. Along every corridor there lurks a gunman and every stairwell presents another opportunity for Lorraine to throw an enemy agent tumbling down in spectacular fashion. But who does what to whom and why is not as important as the car chases, explosions, shootouts, and a neat finale twist that even Hitchcock would have enjoyed.
While the narrative is stock-standard espionage and not a single character is vaguely likeable, the standout features of this film are the cinematography and choreography. A lot of the filming is on location in Budapest and Berlin, and the free-range camerawork is superb in capturing the frenzied atmosphere of Cold War espionage. The fight scenes are notable for more ignoble reasons: they are incessant, repetitive and possibly among the most inauthentic seen in recent times. Not only is it a stretch to see Lorraine take massive blow after blow without smudging her makeup, it can be tiresome to watch the heads of bad guys begin to turn a split second before the heroine executes another textbook martial arts strike. Many agents take a full barrel of bullets to despatch, but others keep popping up like the decapitated Monty Python knight who will not lay down. If attention wanes at any point, the ear-splitting soundtrack lifts the heartrate to required levels. As for the CGI and those bright red head explosions, don’t even ask.
For many, the phrase ‘Hollywood genre films’ is not complimentary and films like this show why. Maybe filmmakers need reminding that there is more to the portrayal of strong women than making them more violent than men. The gratuitous non-stop carnage at times brings this film closer to a gore mashup than a serious spy thriller. Some people will love the action but apart from great camerawork, this writer found little to commend.
Director: David Leitch
Stars: Charlize Theron, James McAvoy
I was on the fence about whether or not to see this one… Sounds like it’s not worth it.
You make a great point that filmmakers don’t seem to realize there is more to making strong female characters than just having them engage in over-the-top ultra violence. But too many in Hollywood seem to have lost the taste for more subtle forms of strength… In female and male characters alike.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks for commenting. I’m surprised that this angle has not been taken up by more critics. Maybe its just not poltically correct to criticise a film for portraying a super-badass female character, but to stay silent is to encourage a raising of the hyper-violence stakes in film’s gender war.
LikeLiked by 3 people
A lot of fun. Even with all the style. Nice review.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I liked it a lot more than I thought I would, even though Lorraine is a very cold character the style of the film really impressed me. The technical side was executed well (though I’ve seen some reviewers complain about the incessant 80’s music) but it was lacking where the narrative was concerned. I know many sapphic women didn’t appreciate how Boutella’s character is killed; it was semi-traumatic for them and fell into the kill your gays trope.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thats a great delvingdeep comment, and thanks for adding that interesting angle about “sapphic women” and the “gays trope”.
LikeLike
Good review. I feel slightly more positive about the film but share a lot of your criticisms
LikeLiked by 1 person
Imagine how dull film conversation would be if we all agreed all the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There seem to be a lot of mixed feelings about this movie, but you made some great points.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It certainly has generated mixed responses, but that makes for a more interesting conversation, dont you think?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Couldn’t agree more!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How sad and what a waste of talent. This doesn’t even seem worthy of Netflix viewing. Hollywood needs to get over violence. It is a deep character flaw . . . which perhaps explains the current political situation in America.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think you have nailed it rangwriter; there is an unusually high number of violent action flicks coming out and it is entirely possible that they are related to the alt-right-inspired political permission being given to the expression of violence.
LikeLike
It would be interesting to study the preponderance of violent films coming from Hollywood vs those coming from foreign or independent film companies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would be confident of the outcome of any such study; Hollywood would win hands down.
LikeLike
I’m sure you’re right. I think what I was meaning to say, but failed to spit out fully, was a correlation between the number of violent acts around the world next to the number of violent films emanating from the respective countries. That’s a mouthful and it still doesn’t make much sense. I think I’ll go self-medicate with a glass of wine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It makes perfect sense to me, and the social science research I recall points to a strong correlation. if movies are a mirror of their society then it stands to reason that societies with high levels of violence will make films that reflect that violence. Enjoy that glass.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Next question to ponder, do movies/media drive or mirror society? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually really enjoyed this movie. I understand where you come from in terms of the representation of women in action films but I actually believe that this is a huge step forward due to the fact that Lorraine was chose because she was the best. There was no alternative motive for her to go on the mission. I also think the way they shot her action is unlike many other action films. I agree the story was a little generic but I still enjoyed it and I went home to listen to the sound track on Spotify.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All that matters is whether you enjoyed the film Dylan. Lets be grateful that today’s filmmakers are not afraid to embrace women in prominent ‘hero’ roles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reach out and touch me…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charlize Theron deserves better than this film.
LikeLiked by 1 person