
Tags
Suburbicon (2017)
Nothing riles the commentariat more than dashed expectations. With George Clooney at the helm of Suburbicon (2017) many expected something special but instead are using much less charitable words. The almost unanimous condemnation of this film is difficult to fathom. When a movie is so widely panned it means either it is a disaster or that it pricks a collective raw nerve somewhere, for some reason. This movie is not a disaster.
Controversially, the film comprises two apparently unrelated plotlines, part of which is based on a true story. Set in 1950s middle class America, Suburbicon was a peaceful all-white neighbourhood until the African-American Mayers family moved in. The white community objects and the local progress association builds a fence to wall off the newcomers. Community anger escalates until permanent crowds are stationed outside the new family’s home, harassing them to the point of violence, television coverage, and police intervention. This background story inter-cuts to a neighbouring family, the Gardners, who are in the middle of a home invasion. Two thugs tie up then chloroform the family, in the process killing Mrs Gardner (Julianne Moore). Soon her twin sister Margaret (also Julianne Moore) moves in to be with widower Lodge Gardner (Matt Damon) and son Nicky (Noah Jupe). It is not long before questions are asked why the loving husband doubled the life insurance on his wife. Mafia connections, an insurance fraud assessor, and a police investigator start lifting the lid of this perfect Suburbicon family. The two separate storylines are narratively linked only by Nicky and the Mayers son becoming baseball friends.
This is a brave way to frame a movie. Either storyline is enough to power an entire movie but running both in parallel appears muddled and narratively diffuse. However, if the viewer’s frame of reference is raised to the overarching level of conservative white American values, then both stories are intensified by their contrast with the other. Keeping the Mayers community racism story in the background and the Gardners domestic crime story in the foreground makes the audience complicit in a glaring social injustice. The Mayers are anonymous, passive victims who are barely seen while we see much of the angry white mob who self-righteously claim the right to live in a white America. Although the general trajectory of both stories is predictable, there are enough twists and turns to keep the tension rising until the film’s finale. Across both stories, there is little subtlety or nuance, and the heavy-handed and obvious symbolism is the film’s greatest fault. But for Hollywood cinema, that is not a hanging offence.
This dark comedic drama is engaging and entertaining. It captures the tones, fashions, and décor of the era, and the acting relies on stereotypes rather than character development. None of the characters compel emotional investment, so the space is left open for the action to do the talking. Filming coincided with the 2016 American election and, like many good filmmakers, Clooney wants to make a political statement. Calling this film a failure is rhetorical hyperbole. It is an audacious and innovative approach to telling a bigger story that just won’t go away.
Director: George Clooney
Stars: Julianne Moore, Matt Damon, Noah Jupe
Nice review. It was messy. But some of it worked for me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha. Well America has some very raw nerves right now. I can imagine a film such as you describe could really prick those raw nerve endings. Which is what good art should do, eh? I’ll look for this one.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The more I think of this film, the more I admire what Clooney has done and the more I suspect the motives behind its panning. Above all else, it puts the torch on the hypocrisy of conversative political/social values. Thanks for commenting rangewriter.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really enjoyed this film, guffawing at the misfortunes of awful people. I found it to be deliciously wicked, cringe worthy escapism. Great review.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is “deliciously wicked” indeed, but its George Clooney who is being wicked. I believe this is the most mis-read film of the year. Nice to hear from you Melissa.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This one does appeal, it sounds like something that might gain slow but eventual praise. It reads above as though Dan.O is saying your review is messy but some of it worked for him, rather than the film which tickles me highly, hahahaha.
Do go to the Cloud and join in with the gift from Esme malarkey, I’d like to connect with Cinemusefilmsman, it’s my second year to send feelers out across the world. *nods and points at the Cloud smiling*
– Esme grinning upon the Cloud
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good luck with the gorgeous hand-painted Christmas cards. Such a talented cloud, arent you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
They’re pen and ink and a variety of other mediums, I’m a messy one to have around you know hahaha. But thank you, so lovely of you to say. I’m sending out Christmas cards though to everyone as well, all my bloggers (the ones I really like who’ll give an address that is *falls about*) it’s quite safe, they’re all still alive after last year *grins*. Only if you want to of course, I moderate all comments so just edit out people’s Addresses/Po.Box no’s/Cave co-ordinates etc.
– Esme Cloud, a Jacqueline of all trades when it comes to Arty stuff
LikeLike
Down here in the colonies the last ship has sailed and the muletrain arrives next Easter. But for bloggers in more civilised parts: Esme’s work is heavenly.
LikeLike
Before watching, I’d read some pretty poor reviews of this film. Quite unfair, to my thinking. It kept me engrossed for the length of its running time at least and invited some thoughtful conversation.
One of the better films of 2017, though not in the top ten.
Great review, as always. (Gets monotonous as they’re all great.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are too kind Anita; and I’m OK with monotomy. I thought the poor reviews missed the crux of this film. It kept me engrossed too. Thanks for the input.
LikeLiked by 1 person