
Tags
The Mountain Between Us (2017)
Casting a dog in a movie is risky; it can steal or wreck the show and sometimes do both. The survival-romance film The Mountain Between Us (2017) is a two-hander supported by a lovable golden Labrador named ‘Dog’. Audiences may be increasingly immune to human tragedy, but life and death is taken more seriously when a pooch is cast in a disaster film to the extent that the movie’s publicity had to assure viewers that the dog is neither killed nor eaten.
It’s a simple tale without real surprises. Neurosurgeon Ben Bass (Idris Elba) and photojournalist Alex Martin (Kate Winslet) meet when their flights are cancelled due to bad weather. She is getting married the next day and he has an urgent operation to perform, so they decide to risk the storm and take a charter flight. When the pilot has a stroke, the inevitable happens and they are stranded on a snowy mountain without communications or hope of being found. With no food, there is only one option left: Ben, Alex, and Dog set off to find civilisation.
So how does the dog wreck the show? The film faces several plausibility and acting challenges that are adversely aided and abetted by Dog. The script and its delivery has an Alpine soap opera quality to it, with neither Elba or Winslet able to step out of their ‘all-wise strong doctor’ and the ‘injured helpless female’ stereotypes. Elba does a lot of intensive furrowing of those deep dark eyebrows which signals a neurosurgeon processing god-like knowledge and Winslet does a passable job of determined dependency. The simmering bond between them barely rises in temperature so all we are left to emotionally connect with is Dog. To make matters worse, whenever danger approaches we think of the most vulnerable first, and that’s Dog.
However, the real flaw is the glaringly obvious contrast between the couple, who are surviving on a few almonds a day after weeks of snowbound trekking, and the dog’s playful prancing through snow as if let out of the house after a big meal. The cold truth is that Dog is hopeless at pretending to be exhausted and the co-stars are not much better. Winslet’s makeup and good looks improve the more she treks and the less she eats, and Elba’s handsome beard stubble stays trim over weeks of hard slog with the only signs of exhaustion their breathless panting and slow-motion movement. As it becomes increasingly difficult to take this film seriously, a cabin appears with all home comforts plus two cans of soup. That’s when the film falls into a hole that not even Dog can save.
To be fair, the cinematography is outstanding, the mountain scenery is post-card beautiful, and even the digital effects are believable if you squint your eyes at the right time. The melodrama finds new heights in the final quarter when the simmering romance finally bubbles over into a glorious cliché that is mercifully brought to an end by the closing credits.
Director: Hany Abu-Assad
Stars: Idris Elba, Kate Winslet, Beau Bridges
Stars: Idris Elba, Kate Winslet, Beau Bridges
Ah, I was wondering when you’d name the actor who plays Dog . . .
More to the point, I saw this described somewhere as the ultimate Lifetime movie, and that’s what I get from both the trailer and your very amusing description/evisceration. Since one of my many guilty secrets is that I quite enjoy Lifetime/Hallmark movies, I’ve made a note — not to find this one at the cinema, which would be beyond the call of duty — but to catch it when it appears on DVD or cable. Sometimes slush goes down just a treat.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Love your comment. I actually tried to track down the dog’s name and found it was played by two of them which explains why Dog was always so lively. As a dog lover myself, I decided not to embarass the dogs as it might jeopardise their careers. Yes, sometimes slush does go down a treat.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That might have been my review. I said that halfway through watching it I realized I was watching “A Lifetime Movie: The Movie.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s it. You get around, don’t you? 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I try.
LikeLike
I enjoyed the film, but had the same thoughts about our actors’ gear and fresh always beauty. The cinematography was grand, but the end run was where LA La land could have been!
LikeLiked by 1 person
IMO the only authentic acting came from the dog. If La La Land had one of these “glorious cliche” endings it would not have won the Oscar.
LikeLike
I’m squinting my eyes trying to imagine Kate Winslet in the role of “determined dependency”. Not an image easily brought to mind. 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL; love throwing such challenges your way Gwen…I know you can handle it. In Aussie we’d call her a stroppy wimp. She has done much better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find her quite fascinating. . . although sometimes I have to separate her from Helena Bonham-Carter in my confused memory. Both women who don’t quite fit the standard female actress cookie-cut mould. I wonder what she saw in the script that appealed to her? Maybe the chance to experience wimpishness. LOL.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She reportedly has sworn off working in sub-zero conditions ever again. Maybe thats why she is so stiff in this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m still laughing at the thought she couldn’t stop her teeth chattering long enough to deliver her lines, so resorted to using her eyes to convey helplessness 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheesy fluff. But good fluff. Nice review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw it at a Ladies Night screening that was half full of ladies who were half full and obviously enjoying cheesy fluff. Vive la difference.
LikeLike
I agree the actualy film was beautiful, but the story line was well, not impressive. I read the book before I saw the movie, and well, read the book. You wont have the same complaints about the dog in the book. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person