
Tags
Darkest Hour (2017)
In the wake of several high-profile films about Britain’s greatest leader, is there anything more to know about Winston Churchill? The archives of history attest to the unique stature of this political figure: more remarkable is the surrounding folklore that has shaped British and world history. It is at this level that Darkest Hour (2017) is perhaps the finest film ever made about the Churchill legend.
The dialogue-dense plotline is tightly compressed yet massive in the scale of its largely unseen off-screen action. Set In the critical weeks of May to June 1940, Winston Churchill (Gary Oldman) emerges as the least objectionable candidate to become Prime Minister after the British Parliament loses confidence in Neville Chamberlain. As the film Dunkirk (2017) so graphically shows, the Nazis had cornered almost the entire British army at Dunkirk and their total destruction was imminent. It was the definitive turning point of World War II: Churchill must inform Parliament that if the British forces are wiped out in France, it may not be long before a swastika will fly from Buckingham Palace. Belgium, France and Holland are entering surrender negotiations and a political group still loyal to Chamberlain are urging that Britain use Mussolini as an intermediary to secure favourable terms for a British surrender. Churchill must weigh the saving of countless young lives if Britain surrenders against the loss of nationhood and life under Nazi rule. As history records, Churchill rejects appeasement and his speeches to the British nation declaring that “we shall never surrender” are still regarded as among the finest ever made.
It needs to be said that Darkest Hour does not add to, nor subtract from, what we know of these historical events: it’s power lies entirely in Gary Oldman’s tour-de-force performance. More psychological thriller than bio-pic, the plotline advances with electrifying gravity, painfully pausing to amplify the enormity of impending national doom. Oldman executes a brilliant screenplay with eloquence, belligerence, and a gifted gravel-voiced orator’s ‘call-to-arms’ like the world has never seen. As we saw in Churchill (2017), this is a profoundly mortal, flawed, and emotionally vulnerable leader: Oldman is simply brilliant in portraying the knife-edge balancing of two fateful options, both of which would shape the course of modern history like no other single event: surrender or risk annihilation. When President Roosevelt declined his personal call for assistance, it was indeed Britain’s darkest hour.
This film comes close to being flawless but for one scene that lingers with an air of compromised plausibility. With a Parliamentary speech about to be given, Churchill bolts from a rear car seat and into the London Tube. He enters a carriage full of ordinary citizens and soon has an audience of astonished gazes which become a single chorus urging Churchill to never surrender. Despite the rousing sentiment, the scene plays like a dream sequence from another movie. Perhaps this is trivial in light of what this excellent film achieves: a portrait of a leader who had the weight of the world on his shoulders and the courage to be guided by his uncompromising belief in the British people. As today’s British and American leaders offer more walls and less leadership, Darkest Hour is a reminder of what leadership actually means.
Director: Joe Wright
Stars: Gary Oldman, Lily James, Kristin Scott Thomas
You are writing really well Richard! My shout for coffee…. let me know when you are free sometime , maybe Wednesday?
Andrew
________________________________
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wednesday coffee has a wonderful ring to it Andrew.
LikeLike
Wow! High praise indeed. It seems Mr. Oldman is a shoe-in for Best Actor awards this year.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Deserves Best Actor and Best Makeup, maybe Best Screenplay.
LikeLike
Richard, loved the film and your review. I posted mine yesterday after losing my first draft on WordPress. I was in quite a funk and still have six movies to review to stay current. I meant to include the Roosevelt decline of assistance, but never thought of it as the actual “darkest hour”, and I am an American. Can’t wait to hear what you think of my Clem hurrah.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your comment. I would love to read your take on it but your blog link does not appear to work.
LikeLike
i am going to see that one over the weekend did they do a film like that about Churchill not long ago?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes Dude. There was an excellent portrait simply called Churchill (2017). There’s a link to my review of it in Darkest Hour.
LikeLike
Saw this yesterday with three others. It seems everyone I speak to is rushing to see it as well. We all enjoyed it tremendously, and discussed the film and events well into the evening. I spoke tonight with two English persons born 1939 and they recited the events of those years (without seeing the film) almost word for word for what happened in the screenplay (politically speaking). So that says volumes doesn’t it? Okay, the train scene was a weak point. I kept hoping he’d finish his speech before they arrived at the next stop. Minor distraction. I suppose it was a “vehicle” to convey the reason why Churchill’s resolve was bolstered, just as he was wavering to accept the Mussolini mediation. I did hear people in the audience who’d seen the film Churchill comment that that was a better portrayal of the man. I can’t comment because I didn’t see that film, nor did I see Dunkirk, as I didn’t want to spoil the memory of a film I’d seen 15 or 20 years earlier. This, The Darkest Hour, is definitely a prequel to any film which covers that amazing rescue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for those interesting observations. There are not many movies I see where the audience applauds at the end. I saw this one at the Cremorne Orpheum: it was a full house and a rousing applause. It seems to strike a collective Aussie nerve as we agonise about what kind of Republic we want while still paying homage to our British heritage. I’m glad you enjoyed it Gwen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I too, found the carriage scene implausible and a blight on an otherwise perfect film. At the end of his rousing speech it was hard to resist the urge to jump to my feet and shout “Yea!”
This is coming from someone who did not approve of Churchill in other scenarios, but he was undoubtably the man for the times. Great acting from Oldman and credit to his make-up team.
I thought Daniel Day Lewis out-acted Oldman in the role played in “Phantom Thread”, but that’s a story for another day. Great Reviews. Thank you very much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Day and Oldman are also my top picks for Best Actor, but I lean towards Oldman for raw acting power. Thanks for commenting.
LikeLike
I finally got around to watching this film. You’re right about the tube scene. It prompted me to wonder, as I watched, did this really happen? I’m sure it did not, but it did work as a solid vehicle to show that, indeed, Churchill sensed the British public’s innermost courage and pride.
I had watched The Crown series which involves Churchill, but does not focus on him. In that series we see the softer side of Churchill, I suspect a bit of a whitewashed portrayal. But I bought, hook, line, and top hat, John Lithgow’s Churchill. Of course, who am I to weigh in on a man I know so little about. But Lithgow seemed to rely less upon makeup and props and was, therefore, free to embody the legend. Just my humble and biased opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the interesting observations. I also do not doubt that something happened in the tube. But it could have been played out in many different genre styles and the one chosen by the director sits oddly in such a tense film.
LikeLike
Yes. The fact that it’s veracity distracted me from the film itself is a signal of something not being quite right. That said, what a minor criticism of an important film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Favourites 2018 | CineMuseFilms